PAMIR ARGUS / AUTONOMOUS DEFENCE ASSURANCE

Operational autonomy.
Evidence that keeps up.

Autonomous systems can change between tests, releases and missions. ARGUS preserves the decision chain so behaviour can be reconstructed, explained and reproduced as evidence.

ARGUS v0.1.0FROZEN BASELINECI PASSDETERMINISTIC REPRODUCIBILITY GATE PASSED
See the evidence chain ↓
PUBLIC-DOMAIN U.S. AIR FORCE FOOTAGE
01

Anything that senses, fuses
and decides leaves a trail.

ARGUS makes that trail inspectable without becoming part of the engagement or control loop.

Sensor layer

Radar, EO/IR, RF and telemetry observations with timestamps and provenance.

OBSERVATION · SOURCE · TIME

Tracking layer

Track formation, association changes and stale or late information.

TRACK · ASSOCIATION · LATENCY

Fusion layer

Sensor disagreement, confidence evolution and fusion divergence.

FUSION · CONFIDENCE · CONFLICT

Decision layer

Decision state, policy context and the first meaningful divergence.

DECISION · CONTEXT · DIVERGENCE
DECISION ENVIRONMENT / COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER

Every autonomous decision
should be reconstructable.

02

The system acts.
ARGUS preserves why.

Six stages connect raw observation to an evidence object that can be reviewed and replayed.

01

Observe

Capture source data and provenance.

02

Align

Preserve timing and synchronisation state.

03

Associate

Track formation and sensor relationships.

04

Reconstruct

Locate first divergence and causal sequence.

05

Replay

Run deterministic and counterfactual cases.

06

Prove

Produce a reproducible Evidence Object.

03

Five controlled cases.
One reproducibility contract.

ARGUS v0.1.0 has passed its deterministic release gate across a nominal control and four synthetic failure scenarios. Validation is limited to the synthetic environment described here.

ARGUS-C00

Nominal baseline

No divergence expected.

CONTROL
ARGUS-T01

Clock drift

First divergence at temporal integrity.

TIME
ARGUS-T02

Stale observation

Observation freshness failure is preserved.

LATENCY
ARGUS-S01

Sensor disagreement

Cross-sensor consistency divergence.

FUSION
ARGUS-A01

Association failure

Object identity disagreement is explicit.

ASSOCIATION
REPRODUCIBLE EVIDENCE

Evidence Pack Release Manifest SHA-256 digest repeat build identical deterministic output

04

A gap must stay a gap.

ARGUS separates supported findings from missing evidence. Unknowns are explicit; provenance remains attached.

FRAGMENTED RECONSTRUCTION

Logs without lineage

Different interpretation on each review

Missing data silently inferred

Evidence assembled after the incident

ARGUS EVIDENCE

Source and transformation attached

Deterministic reconstruction

Unknown explicitly reported

Evidence structure preserved from the chain

05

Five things,
done deliberately.

01

Decision provenance

Trace observations and transformations behind a system decision.

02

First-divergence detection

Find the earliest meaningful separation between expected and observed behaviour.

03

Deterministic reconstruction

Rebuild the same evidence sequence from the same inputs.

04

Counterfactual replay

Test alternate inputs without altering the original evidence record.

05

Evidence sufficiency

State what the evidence supports, what remains unknown and what would close the gap.

REFERENCE ARCHITECTUREARGUS v0.1.0 / FROZEN
RADAREO / IRRFTRACKERFUSIONDECISION
ARGUS EVIDENCE FLIGHT RECORDERPROVENANCETIME INTEGRITYFIRST DIVERGENCECAUSAL RECONSTRUCTIONCOUNTERFACTUAL REPLAYEVIDENCE SUFFICIENCY
06

Evidence management.
Never engagement authority.

NO weapon control

NO target selection

NO engagement guidance

NO software approval decisions

YES inspectable evidence

PAMIR ARGUS / PAMILANGA LIMITED

Bring us a decision chain
you need to explain.

Discuss an ARGUS integration pilot for evidence capture, deterministic reconstruction and assurance evaluation. We will show what the evidence supports, where the first divergence occurs, and what remains unknown.